home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TNA-GOLD 1
/
TNA-GOLD - Volume 1.iso
/
24hours
/
free5.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-03-11
|
9KB
|
151 lines
[stating the obvious]
---------------------------------------------------------
"Here I Am" vs. "Here is What I Think."
March 11, 1996
[the obvious archives] A couple of weeks ago I had an
interesting email land in my inbox. It
was from an obvious reader, though he
didn't really identify himself as such.
[the obvious links] He just dove right into the topic at
hand...
as each of us develops and
leaves a trail of ideas on
[about the obvious] this net it amazes me how
quickly it is becoming less
the self-indulgent "here I am"
and more the "here is what I
[EFF Blue Ribbon] think." that and commerce -
The obvious the ads proliferate.
ribbon.
At first, I was flattered. "Finally," I
thought. "Stating the Obvious has found
a kindred soul... One who sees my weekly
A big fat welcome to musings as a light in the darkness,
Crisp readers. guiding him away from the unwashed,
You can get back to self-indulgent masses." Well, maybe
where you came from... that's going a bit far. Maybe I was just
happy to be thought of as one in a
"trail of ideas."
But then something hit me. Why the hell
is here I am considered to be more
self-indulgent than here is what I
think? And when it's so damn easy to
publish on the web, and considering that
hardly anyone out there is operating
under an editor's benevolent knife, is
there really a difference between here I
am and this is what I think?
I've been reading a good deal of here I
am type sites lately. Maybe it's just
because the "trail of ideas" can be
completely mind-numbing; opinion after
opinion after opinion. It's the here I
am sites that leave more than a trail of
ideas -- they're proof that there is a
trail of people out there behind the
addresses. Not to mention lots of
personal dirt to satisfy any voyeur's
cravings...
* Justin Hall turned links from the
underground into www.links.net, the
home page of which is a daily free
form poem on the state of his life
at Swarthmore College. Right now,
Justin seems to be enduring a
spring break trip to Florida. But
the writing continues unabated,
with stories of night time on the
Daytona strip.
* Greg Knauss lives his "other" life
in Los Angeles, punctuated by the
occasional email message, each one
beginning with the casual "so..."
As in, "So Larry and Heather gave
Joanne and I a breadmaker..." or
"So there's this billboard along
the 405..." or "So Joanne and I are
in Vegas on New Year's Eve..."
* Mark Thomas (a self-described man
of action) continues his writings
on New York miscellany. Amongst
stories of mis-dialed phone
numbers, dreams of job rejections,
and auditioning pianos, there are
receipts. Dozens of them. For
groceries, records, pet supplies,
soap and depression medication.
* Rebecca Eisenberg writes her daily
journal about not much in
particular, save 2 a.m. sessions on
IRC and nights spent at the
Paradise Lounge in San Francisco.
But you've got to admire someone
with their own FAQ, where they
answer the question "so, do you
sleep?" with "not much. do you?"
There's a site, though, that continues
to confound. And that, of course, is
Suck. Joey Annuff and Carl Steadman seem
to live simultaneously at the two
extremes of here I am!!! and this is
what I think.
Most pieces, like the their rants
recounting their visit to the TEDSell
conference, or the Media and Democracy
Congress screams nothing more than "we
were there! You weren't!"
Pure here I am.
Occasionally they'll pull off a piece
like "The Bookmark Less Travelled,"
which bemoaned bookmark management
software, since it encourages web
surfers that are "always traveling,
never arriving." Or "TV by the Blind,"
which nailed every corporate web effort
to the wall.
Pure this is what I think.
Maybe that tension is the point. Maybe
they are just playing with the nature of
the web, playing with the tension
between the frivolity of personal
journals and the self-righteous
seriousness of brainstorms.
Eh, maybe not. But if they are, they've
got their work cut out for them. When
Suck sold out to HotWired, Brock Meeks
called them the "ombudsmen with
Attitude." Note the capital A. From what
it looks like, they're going to use
their new found HotWired resources (read
"money") to expand their site. A
rant-a-day is one thing. A full fledged
site which continues to straddle the
line between pure ombudsmen and pure
attitude is another.
Not to mention what the nature of
"proliferating ads" (as my friendly
correspondent put it) will do to them.
-----------------------------------------
Copyright 1996 by Michael Sippey
michael@theobvious.com
Enhanced for Netscape 1.1 and higher.
This site changes every
Monday...bookmark it.